Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 7, 2021

WiAV Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:19-cv-04978
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In WiAV Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation, Judge Parker granted HTC’s motion to seal narrowly redacted portions of seven contracts.

Who this affects

HTC Corporation, WiAV Solutions Inc., the parties to the seven contracts, and members of the public seeking access to those documents.

What happened

WiAV Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation involved HTC’s request to keep portions of seven contracts from public view. HTC submitted the contracts with its motion for summary judgment.

The court had previously found HTC’s proposed redactions too broad and ordered narrower redactions. After reviewing HTC’s revised submission, the court found that the redactions were limited to protecting legitimate business and privacy interests and preventing competitive harm.

Judge Katharine H. Parker granted HTC’s motion to seal and requested that the clerk keep the documents filed at ECF No. 118 under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
WiAV Solutions Inc. v. HTC Corporation · No. 1:19-cv-04978
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
June 7, 2021

Background

HTC filed a motion to seal portions of seven contracts submitted with its motion for summary judgment. The court had previously ruled that HTC’s proposed redactions were too broad and ordered HTC to submit revised redactions narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of the parties to the contracts.

Court’s Analysis

After reviewing HTC’s revised proposed redactions, the court found that they were narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business and privacy interests and to avoid competitive harm from disclosure. The court stated that the revised redactions were consistent with the Second Circuit’s standard for sealing judicial documents.

Ruling

The court granted HTC’s motion to seal, for the reasons stated in its earlier opinion and order. It requested that the clerk keep the documents filed at ECF No. 118 under seal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.