Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 10, 2021

Irizarry v. Manhattan Correctional Center

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-05170
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Irizarry v. Manhattan Correctional Center, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Jorge V. Irizarry, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required application within 30 days to avoid dismissal without prejudice.

What happened

In Jorge V. Irizarry v. Manhattan Correctional Center, Jorge V. Irizarry filed a civil action while incarcerated and without a lawyer. He submitted a prisoner authorization but did not pay the required fees or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Irizarry 30 days to pay $402 in fees or submit the required application. If he does not comply, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order and said that no summons would issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Irizarry v. Manhattan Correctional Center · No. 1:21-cv-05170
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 10, 2021

Background

Jorge V. Irizarry, who was incarcerated at the Manhattan Correctional Center, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He filed a complaint but did not pay the filing and administrative fees or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying court fees. He did submit a prisoner authorization.

Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization permits the court to collect the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account if the application is granted. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted this status.

The court ordered Irizarry, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $402 or submit the attached application, labeled with docket number 21-CV-5170 (LTS). The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Irizarry complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice.

Additional Ruling and Effect

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Irizarry’s claims. It also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner-filing statute, but it did not make such a dismissal here.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.