C. v. New York City Department of Education
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-10663
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In C. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Vyskocil conditionally dismissed the action after the parties reported a settlement in principle.
C. and J.R., who brought the action, and the New York City Department of Education. The action was dismissed subject to the stated restoration deadline.
What happened
In C. v. New York City Department of Education, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms. The plaintiff brought the case individually and on behalf of J.R.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the action discontinued without costs and allowed either party to seek restoration to the court’s calendar by April 30, 2021. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- C. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:20-cv-10663
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 31, 2021
Background
C., individually and on behalf of J.R., sued the New York City Department of Education. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or provide the terms of the parties’ settlement. The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered an order of dismissal. The action was discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application to restore the action was made by April 30, 2021. The order stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.