Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 18, 2021

Fernandez v. HR Parking Inc

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:16-cv-02762
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fernandez v. HR Parking Inc., Judge Gorenstein canceled the trial and required filings addressing whether the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement is fair.

Who this affects

Bryan Fernandez and the other plaintiffs, HR Parking Inc. and the other defendants, and their attorneys.

What happened

In Fernandez v. HR Parking Inc., the court canceled the trial scheduled for June 21, 2021. The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion by July 8, 2021, addressing whether their settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss the claims and defenses, possible damages, the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s case, the settlement negotiations, and other relevant issues.

Judge Gorenstein also required the parties to disclose their attorney-fee arrangement, provide the fee agreement and information about fees incurred, and attach the settlement agreement. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fernandez v. HR Parking Inc · No. 1:16-cv-02762
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
June 18, 2021

Background

Bryan Fernandez and other plaintiffs sued HR Parking Inc. and other defendants. The opinion states that the case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing subjects such as minimum wages and overtime. The parties had reached a settlement, but the opinion does not provide its terms.

Court’s Order

The court canceled the trial scheduled for June 21, 2021. Because the case includes Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable under the court-review requirements discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

The filing must address the claims and defenses; the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case and the defendants’ defenses; reasons for any difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; the litigation and negotiation process; and other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment could be collected after trial.

The parties must also disclose their attorney-fee arrangement, attach the fee agreement, provide information about the attorney fees actually incurred, and attach the settlement agreement itself. The filing deadline was July 8, 2021.

Disposition

Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein canceled the trial and ordered the parties to submit the specified settlement-review materials. The order did not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.