Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 1, 2021

Johnson v. Silva

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-05671
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Johnson v. Silva, Judge Swain ordered Todd Johnson to pay fees or submit a complete amended application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Todd Johnson, who must either pay the $402 fees or submit a complete amended application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Johnson v. Silva, Todd Johnson, representing himself, asked to proceed without paying court fees upfront. He submitted an application describing his finances, but left important questions unanswered.

The court said it could not decide whether Johnson could afford the fees. Within 30 days, Johnson must either pay $402 or submit an amended application that fully explains his current income and expenses. No summons will issue at this time, and the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Silva · No. 1:21-cv-05671
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 1, 2021

Background

Todd Johnson brought the action without a lawyer. To begin a civil case in federal court, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Johnson submitted an IFP application, but the court found that it did not fully answer questions about his financial situation. He indicated that he was not currently unemployed without providing his last employment date or prior gross monthly wages. He also indicated that he received no income from listed sources without explaining how he paid his expenses, and he did not detail his housing, transportation, utilities, or other monthly expenses.

Court’s Action

Because the application did not provide enough information about Johnson’s income and expenses, the court said it could not determine whether he had enough money to pay the fees. The court therefore directed Johnson, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended IFP application.

The amended application must address the identified deficiencies, describe Johnson’s current financial situation, provide facts showing that he cannot pay the fees, and include docket number 21-CV-5671 (LTS). If the court grants the amended application, Johnson may proceed without paying the fees in advance. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Johnson a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. If Johnson does not comply within the permitted period, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal and Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. This order did not decide the merits of Johnson’s claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.