Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 6, 2021

Haxhani v. Elsayed III Corp .

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-08247
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Haxhani v. Elsayed III Corp., Judge Aaron approved a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement, dismissed the action with prejudice, and retained jurisdiction to enforce it.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the action are affected: the settlement was approved, the action was dismissed with prejudice, and the court retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.

What happened

Haxhani v. Elsayed III Corp. involved claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wages and working conditions. The parties reached a settlement at a settlement conference on May 24, 2021, and later agreed that Judge Aaron would handle all proceedings.

The parties submitted their proposed settlement agreement on June 29, 2021. After reviewing it, the court found the agreement fair and reasonable and approved it.

The court dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. Judge Aaron also retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Haxhani v. Elsayed III Corp . · No. 1:20-cv-08247
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
July 6, 2021

Background

The action included one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The parties reached a settlement during a settlement conference before Judge Aaron on May 24, 2021. They later consented to have all proceedings conducted before him. On June 29, 2021, they submitted their proposed settlement agreement.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable, citing the required review standard under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as may be stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.