Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 8, 2021

Hidalgo v. Doe Corp.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:21-cv-02560
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hidalgo v. Doe Defendant Corp., Judge Aaron approved a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The order affected Manuel Hidalgo, Doe Defendant Corp., d/b/a Tavola, the other defendants, and the claims brought on behalf of Hidalgo and others similarly situated.

What happened

Manuel Hidalgo brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case against Doe Defendant Corp., doing business as Tavola, and other defendants, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated.

The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement and related documents. The court reviewed the agreement and found that it was fair and reasonable.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement, dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the agreement, retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, and directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hidalgo v. Doe Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-02560
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
July 8, 2021

Background

Manuel Hidalgo brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Doe Defendant Corp., doing business as Tavola, and other defendants. On June 25, 2021, the parties consented to have the magistrate judge decide the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Settlement

The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement and related papers on July 4 and July 5, 2021. After reviewing the proposed agreement, the court found that it was fair and reasonable and approved the settlement.

Ruling and disposition

Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and directed the clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.