Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2021

Stevenson v. De Blasio

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:21-cv-05065
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Stevenson v. De Blasio, Judge Torres dismissed Stevenson’s civil-rights claims against Letitia James as barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity.

Who this affects

Eric Stevenson’s claims against New York Attorney General Letitia James were dismissed. The opinion does not state a disposition for Stevenson’s claims against the other defendants.

What happened

In Stevenson v. De Blasio, Eric Stevenson, representing himself, sued several New York City officials and entities under a federal civil-rights law, alleging violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. He later amended his complaint to add New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The court dismissed Stevenson’s claims against Letitia James. It ruled that the Eleventh Amendment generally prevents suits against states and state officials in federal court, and that New York had not waived that protection and Congress had not removed it for these claims.

Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on July 20, 2021. The opinion’s ruling addressed the claims against Letitia James; it does not state dispositions for the claims against the other defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stevenson v. De Blasio · No. 1:21-cv-05065
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
July 20, 2021

Background

Eric Stevenson, proceeding without a lawyer, brought the action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against people acting under state law for violating constitutional rights. He alleged violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. On July 2, 2021, Stevenson amended the complaint to add New York Attorney General Letitia James as a defendant.

The court noted that federal courts generally exercise caution before dismissing a self-represented plaintiff’s complaint before the defendants have been served. It also stated that courts may dismiss claims at that stage when they clearly lack a legal or factual basis, and may deny an opportunity to amend when amendment would be futile.

Ruling

The court held that Stevenson’s claims against Letitia James were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The court explained that states generally cannot be sued in federal court unless they waive their immunity or Congress removes it. That protection also extends to state agents and state instrumentalities that function as arms of the state. The court found that New York had not waived its immunity and that Congress had not removed it when it enacted § 1983.

The court therefore dismissed Stevenson’s § 1983 claims against Letitia James. The opinion does not state a disposition for the claims against the other defendants.

Order

Judge Analisa Torres directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the order to Stevenson. The order was dated July 20, 2021, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.