Davis v. Doe 1
- Analisa Torres
- 1:21-cv-08451
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Davis v. Doe 1, Judge Torres ordered identification of unnamed defendants and denied counsel without prejudice.
Javon Davis; the unnamed John Doe officers he seeks to sue; the New York City Law Department and Department of Correction, which must assist in identifying the officers.
What happened
In Davis v. Doe 1, Javon Davis, who is incarcerated, sued unnamed Emergency Services Unit officers under a federal civil-rights law for alleged constitutional violations during his detention at Otis Bantum Correctional Center. He is representing himself without a lawyer and had permission to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront.
The court ordered the New York City Law Department to identify the unnamed officers, provide their badge numbers and service addresses within 60 days, and give that information to Davis and the court. Davis must file an amended complaint naming them within 30 days after receiving the information.
Judge Analisa Torres denied Davis’s request for a court-appointed volunteer lawyer without prejudice, meaning he may renew the request later. The order did not decide whether his claims were valid.
The detailed version
- Davis v. Doe 1 · No. 1:21-cv-08451
- Analisa Torres
- Nov. 2, 2021
Background
Javon Davis, who is currently incarcerated in Ulster Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against state or local officials for violating federal rights. He alleges that unnamed Emergency Services Unit officers violated his constitutional rights while he was held at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on August 2 and 3, 2021. The court had previously granted his request to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront.
Identifying the unnamed defendants
Because Davis provided enough information for the New York City Department of Correction to identify the officers, the court ordered the New York City Law Department, which represents and acts as the Department’s agent, to determine the identity and badge number of each John Doe defendant and provide the defendants’ service addresses. The Law Department must provide that information to Davis and the court within 60 days of the order.
Davis must file an amended complaint naming the defendants within 30 days after receiving the information. The amended complaint will replace, rather than add to, the original complaint. The court stated that it will screen the amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order asking the defendants to waive formal service.
Request for volunteer counsel
Davis also asked the court to request a volunteer lawyer. In considering such a request, the court considers the apparent strength of the case, the plaintiff’s efforts to obtain a lawyer, and the plaintiff’s ability to investigate and present the case without assistance. The court stated that it was too early to assess the merits of Davis’s claims.
Ruling
Judge Analisa Torres denied Davis’s application for the court to request volunteer counsel without prejudice to renewal at a later date. The order did not resolve the merits of Davis’s constitutional claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.