Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2021

Pelaez v. JCJ Bakery Corp.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-09517
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Pelaez v. JCJ Bakery Corp., Judge Aaron granted the parties’ request for more time to finalize and submit their settlement agreement.

Who this affects

The parties in Pelaez v. JCJ Bakery Corp., who received additional time to finalize and submit their settlement for court review.

What happened

In Pelaez v. JCJ Bakery Corp., the parties jointly asked for more time to finish the terms of their settlement and submit it to the court for review and approval. They said they needed to address administrative issues and accommodate vacation schedules.

The parties requested an extension from August 6, 2021, to September 3, 2021. They described it as their first request for an extension.

Judge Stewart Aaron granted the request and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 26.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pelaez v. JCJ Bakery Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-09517
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Aug. 4, 2021

Background

The parties jointly requested an extension of the deadline to finalize their settlement terms and submit the settlement to the court for review and approval. Their letter stated that the additional time was needed to address administrative issues in the agreement and to accommodate vacation schedules. The parties said the existing deadline was August 6, 2021, and that this was their first extension request. They referenced the requirement for court review and approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Ruling

The court granted the application to extend the deadline to September 3, 2021. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate ECF No. 26. The opinion does not state that the settlement was approved or that the case was otherwise resolved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.