Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 21, 2022

Martinez Martinez v. Oscar De La Renta, LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:21-cv-02405
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Martinez Martinez v. Oscar De La Renta, LLC, Judge Aaron dismissed the settled action with prejudice, retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Nancy Martinez Martinez and Oscar De La Renta, LLC; the court retained jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement.

What happened

Nancy Martinez Martinez and Oscar De La Renta, LLC submitted a fully signed settlement agreement after the court had preliminarily approved the settlement.

The court ordered the action dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. It also retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement and directed the clerk to close the case.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered the order on June 21, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Martinez Martinez v. Oscar De La Renta, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-02405
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
June 21, 2022

Background

The court had preliminarily approved the parties’ settlement on June 6, 2021, pending submission of a fully signed settlement agreement. The parties filed that agreement on June 17, 2021.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as may be stated in the settlement agreement. “With prejudice” means the action cannot be refiled. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and requested that the clerk close the case.

Disposition

The case was dismissed with prejudice under the settlement agreement. The order was entered by Stewart D. Aaron, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 21, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.