Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 9, 2021

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Minelli Construction Co., Inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:19-cv-02062
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
ArbitrationContractEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Carpenters Funds v. Minelli Construction, Judge Gardephe confirmed the $22,036.64 arbitration award and granted $1,017.50 in fees and $75 in costs.

Who this affects

The petitioners obtained a judgment confirming the $22,036.64 arbitration award against Minelli Construction Co., Inc., plus $1,017.50 in attorneys’ fees, $75 in costs, and applicable interest.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Funds v. Minelli Construction Co., Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Minelli Construction. The dispute arose from a collective bargaining agreement requiring Minelli to make contributions to the funds and allow audits. An audit found unpaid contributions, and Minelli did not oppose the court petition.

The arbitrator awarded the petitioners $22,036.64, including unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, fees, and costs. The court reviewed the petition even though it was unopposed and found no genuine dispute preventing confirmation. It also found that the award was within the arbitrator’s authority under the parties’ agreement.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe granted the petition, directed entry of judgment for $22,036.64 with 7% interest from December 21, 2018, until judgment, and awarded $1,017.50 in attorneys’ fees and $75 in costs. Post-judgment interest will apply at the rate set by federal law, and the case was closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:19-cv-02062
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Aug. 9, 2021

Background

The petitioners were trustees of labor-management trust funds, trustees of a charitable fund, a not-for-profit corporation, and a labor organization. Minelli Construction Co., Inc. had entered into a collective bargaining agreement with the labor organization. The agreement required Minelli to contribute to the funds for each hour worked by its employees and to provide books and records for audits.

An audit covering June 22, 2015, through December 25, 2016, found that Minelli had not made required contributions. The agreement required disputes to be submitted to arbitration and made the arbitrator’s decision final and binding. It also allowed recovery of unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

The petitioners served Minelli with a notice of arbitration. The arbitration hearing took place on December 10, 2018, and the arbitrator issued an award on December 21, 2018. The arbitrator considered testimony from the auditor and other evidence. Minelli appeared at the arbitration hearing and did not dispute the audit findings; its principal explained that Minelli was a small contractor, had not been paid by a general contractor for work it performed, and did not have the money to pay the claims.

The arbitrator awarded the petitioners $22,036.64, consisting of $840.14 in unpaid contributions, $70.54 in interest, $157.28 in liquidated damages, $17,867.60 in late-payment interest, $400 in court costs, $1,500 in attorneys’ fees, $500 in arbitrator’s fees, and $2,380 in audit costs. The award provided for interest at 7% beginning December 21, 2018.

The petitioners filed this case seeking confirmation of the award, attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the court action, and post-judgment interest. Minelli did not appear in this action or oppose the petition.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that confirming an arbitration award is a limited review. Courts must give substantial deference to an arbitrator’s decision and generally may not reconsider the arbitrator’s factual or contractual conclusions. Even when a petition is unopposed, however, the court must review the petitioner’s submissions to determine whether they establish entitlement to judgment and show that no material factual dispute remains.

The court found that the petitioners had met that burden. The arbitrator had considered evidence from the hearing, including the auditor’s testimony, and had found that Minelli was delinquent under the collective bargaining agreement. The court also found that the award was within the authority granted by the agreement, which covered disputes about the agreement’s application, interpretation, effect, purpose, or breach.

The court identified the statutory grounds for vacating an arbitration award, including fraud, arbitrator bias or corruption, serious misconduct, or an arbitrator’s exceeding the granted authority. It found no evidence that the award was unlawful, arbitrary, or beyond the arbitrator’s powers. The petition to confirm the arbitration award was therefore granted.

Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Interest

The petitioners requested $1,017.50 in attorneys’ fees, representing 3.7 hours of work at $275 per hour, and $75 in costs. The court found those amounts reasonable because they reflected the rates paid by the petitioners and were consistent with rates awarded in comparable cases. The court granted the application for fees and costs.

The court also granted the request for post-judgment interest at the rate required by federal law. The judgment was to include the $22,036.64 arbitration award, 7% interest from December 21, 2018, until entry of judgment, $1,017.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $75 in costs. Post-judgment interest on the entire amount would accrue from the date judgment was entered. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.