Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 16, 2021

Henderson v. Alvarez

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:17-cv-03977
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Summary JudgmentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Henderson v. Alvarez, Judge Nathan granted Southwell summary judgment, denied appeal fee-waiver status, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Henderson’s case was resolved against him as to Southwell’s favor on summary judgment; Henderson was also denied permission to appeal without paying court fees, and the case was closed.

What happened

Henderson v. Alvarez involved a case brought by Henderson against Alvarez and other defendants. The judgment does not describe the underlying claims or events.

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant Southwell. Summary judgment is a decision resolving a case or claim without a trial when the legal standard for that decision is met.

Judge Alison Nathan’s court also denied Henderson permission to appeal without paying court fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The case was closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Henderson v. Alvarez · No. 1:17-cv-03977
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Sept. 16, 2021

What the judgment says

The judgment concerns Henderson as plaintiff and Alvarez and other defendants. It states that the court’s reasons were set out in a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated September 16, 2021, but that memorandum is not included in the provided text. The underlying claims, facts, and legal arguments therefore cannot be determined from this judgment alone.

Rulings

The court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant Southwell. Summary judgment is a ruling that resolves a claim without a trial when the court determines that the applicable legal standard is satisfied. The judgment does not explain the court’s reasoning or identify which claims were resolved.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal. In plain English, the court denied permission to pursue an appeal without paying the required court fees. The judgment states that the case was closed. Judge Alison Nathan is identified in the supplied case information; the judgment itself is signed by the clerk of court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.