Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2021

Bocel v. Patzeria Family & Friends Inc.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:21-cv-07384
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Bocel v. Patzeria Family & Friends, Inc., Judge Schofield canceled a conference and set steps for possible conditional certification and any dismissal motion.

Who this affects

The order affected Ricardo Bocel and Patzeria Family & Friends, Inc., along with the other defendants, by canceling the initial pretrial conference and setting deadlines for discussions and possible motions.

What happened

In Bocel v. Patzeria Family & Friends, Inc., the court said the parties’ joint letter and proposed case-management plan raised no significant issues before the scheduled initial pretrial conference.

The court canceled the December 2, 2021, conference, while allowing the parties to ask that it be reinstated. It ordered the parties to discuss whether they could agree to conditional certification and the form of notice, and set deadlines for a possible certification-motion letter if they could not agree. It also directed defendants to follow the court’s rules if they sought to file a motion to dismiss.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield issued the order on November 30, 2021. The order addressed scheduling and potential motions; it did not decide whether conditional certification should be granted or whether any claim should be dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bocel v. Patzeria Family & Friends Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-07384
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Nov. 30, 2021

Background

An initial pretrial conference was scheduled for December 2, 2021. The parties had submitted a joint letter and proposed case-management plan, and the court found that they had raised no significant issues requiring the conference.

Orders

The court canceled the December 2 conference but stated that the parties could ask the court to reinstate it if they believed a conference would be useful. The court said that a case-management plan and scheduling order would issue separately.

The court also ordered the parties to meet and discuss whether they would stipulate to conditional certification and the form of notice. Conditional certification is an initial, generally less demanding step for determining whether a group of workers or other plaintiffs may proceed together. The parties were required to report their position by December 7, 2021, while defendants retained the right to challenge any later final certification under the stricter standard applicable at that stage.

If the parties could not agree, the court required the plaintiff to file a pre-motion letter about a conditional-certification motion by December 16, 2021, and defendants to respond by December 23, 2021. The court separately instructed defendants to file a pre-motion letter under the judge’s individual rules if they intended to seek dismissal.

Disposition and Effect

This order canceled a scheduled conference and established procedures and deadlines for possible future motions. It did not grant or deny conditional certification, rule on the form of notice, or decide any motion to dismiss. Judge Lorna G. Schofield issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.