Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2022

Bal v. U.S. Department of the Treasury

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:21-cv-04702
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bal v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Judge Vyskocil extended service time and directed marshals to serve defendants after Bal was allowed to proceed without fees.

Who this affects

John Bal, the named defendants, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Bal v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, John Bal was allowed to proceed without paying court fees. The court explained that, in this situation, Bal could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

The court extended the deadline for service to 90 days after the summons was issued. It instructed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms, issue summonses, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service for service on the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, Jason E. Prince, Marshall Fields, Charles Bishop, PayPal, Inc., and Robert Hurst.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued an order of service. The opinion addressed service and case administration; it did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bal v. U.S. Department of the Treasury · No. 1:21-cv-04702
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Jan. 4, 2022

Background

The opinion states that the court had previously allowed John Bal to proceed without paying court fees. Because Bal was proceeding under that permission, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Service deadline

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 generally requires service of the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court concluded that Bal could not have served the summons and amended complaint before the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The court therefore extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons was issued. The court stated that, if the amended complaint was not served within that period, Bal should request an extension of time.

Court’s directions

For service on the United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, Jason E. Prince, Marshall Fields, and Charles Bishop, the Clerk of Court was instructed to complete U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms, mark the forms for service on the United States, issue summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the necessary paperwork.

For service on PayPal, Inc. and Robert Hurst, the Clerk was instructed to complete the service forms, issue summonses, and provide the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service.

Disposition and scope

The court entered an order of service. The opinion did not decide whether Bal’s underlying claims were legally valid, and it did not enter judgment on those claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.