Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 29, 2024

Rahaman v. Second Avenue Catering Inc.

Judge
Ona Wang
Docket
1:24-cv-00172
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Rahaman v. Second Avenue Caterin Inc.: Judge Wang found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable and directed closure of the case.

Who this affects

Mizanoor Rahaman and the defendants, including Second Avenue Caterin Inc.; the case was ordered closed after the settlement was found fair and reasonable.

What happened

In Rahaman v. Second Avenue Caterin Inc., the court reviewed the parties’ settlement submissions. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the standard discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., and found it fair and reasonable.

Judge Wang directed the Clerk to close the settlement submission and then close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rahaman v. Second Avenue Catering Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00172
Judge
Ona Wang
Date
Apr. 29, 2024

Background

The court reviewed the parties’ settlement submissions. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). It found that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to close the settlement submission at ECF 17 and then close the case. The opinion was signed by Ona T. Wang, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.