Roman v. New York City Department of Education
- Laura Swain
- 1:21-cv-06162
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Roman v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Furman extended service deadlines and ordered steps for serving defendants.
Melinda Maldonado Roman, Raquel Pevey, Christy Curran, and the New York City Department of Education were affected by the service and filing directives.
What happened
In Roman v. New York City Department of Education, Melinda Maldonado Roman was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees. The court addressed how her complaint and amended complaint would be served.
The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued. It directed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Raquel Pevey and Christy Curran. The Clerk also had to docket the amended complaint, and the New York City Department of Education had to tell the court within 30 days whether it would accept service without formal delivery.
Judge Jesse M. Furman entered these service-related directives on January 4, 2022. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Roman v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:21-cv-06162
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 4, 2022
Background
The court had granted Plaintiff permission to proceed without paying filing fees. Because a plaintiff proceeding this way may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendants, the court addressed the timing and mechanics of service.
Service deadline
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires service of the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court explained that Plaintiff could not have served the papers before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons. It therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. The court stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Plaintiff should request an extension of time.
Orders concerning service and filings
To permit service on Raquel Pevey and Christy Curran through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court was directed to complete a separate U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant. The Clerk was also directed to issue a summons and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve them.
The Clerk was further directed to docket, as a new entry, the amended complaint attached to Plaintiff’s letter at ECF No. 15. The New York City Department of Education was directed to notify the court within 30 days whether it would waive service of the complaint. The order noted that the City of New York had already been served.
Disposition
Judge Jesse M. Furman issued service and docketing instructions. The order did not rule on the merits of Plaintiff’s claims or dismiss any claim.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.