Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2022

Buchbinder v. Hochul

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-00043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Buchbinder v. Hochul, Judge Swain ordered Pamela Buchbinder to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Pamela Buchbinder, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, and the processing of her civil action.

What happened

In Buchbinder v. Hochul, Pamela Buchbinder filed a civil action while incarcerated and without a lawyer. She did not pay the required fees or submit completed forms requesting permission to proceed without paying them in advance.

The court gave Buchbinder 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing installment deductions from her account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if she did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also found that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Buchbinder's claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Buchbinder v. Hochul · No. 1:22-cv-00043
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 5, 2022

Background

Pamela Buchbinder, who was incarcerated at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer. She submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Court's Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization also directs the facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the prior six months.

The court ordered Buchbinder, within 30 days of the order, to choose one of those options. It directed the Clerk of Court to mail her the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. If Buchbinder complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if she did not comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Other Warnings

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also warned that a future dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under the federal prisoner-litigation statute. The court did not decide whether Buchbinder's underlying claims were legally valid.

Disposition

The court issued an order requiring payment of fees or submission of the required applications and authorization. It did not dismiss the action in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.