Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2022

Hurt v. United States

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-10781
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hurt v. United States, Judge Swain denied Hurt leave to file because he violated an earlier filing restriction.

Who this affects

Tyrone Hurt, whose new action was denied permission to be filed because he did not comply with an earlier filing restriction; the United States was named as the defendant.

What happened

In Hurt v. United States, Tyrone Hurt filed a new lawsuit without paying the filing fee, submitting an application to proceed without paying fees, or asking for permission to file. An earlier court order had required him to obtain permission before filing any new fee-free lawsuit.

The court denied Hurt permission to file this action because he did not follow that earlier order. The court also ruled that an appeal would not be considered filed without fees because it would not be taken in good faith.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to mail Hurt a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The order did not address the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hurt v. United States · No. 1:21-cv-10781
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 7, 2022

Background

On October 11, 2013, the court barred Tyrone Hurt from filing any new action without paying fees unless he first obtained the court's permission. In this case, Hurt filed a new action without paying the filing fees, submitting an application to proceed without paying fees, or seeking permission to file.

Ruling

Because Hurt did not comply with the earlier filing restriction, the court denied him leave to file this action. The order does not discuss the merits of the claims against the United States.

Appeal and Service

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Hurt a copy of the order and note service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.