Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 7, 2022

Ocampo Vazquez v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp.

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:21-cv-02793
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ocampo Vazquez v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan, Judge Gorenstein approved a fair settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Domingo Ocamp Vazquez and defendants Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp. and the other defendants named in the action.

What happened

In Ocampo Vazquez v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp., the parties submitted a proposed settlement resolving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The court reviewed the settlement and found it fair and reasonable. It approved the settlement.

Judge Gorenstein dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement, retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, and declared any pending motions moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ocampo Vazquez v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-02793
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
Jan. 7, 2022

Background

The plaintiff brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties agreed to have the magistrate judge decide the matter with their consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). They submitted a proposed settlement agreement in a January 5, 2022 filing.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., which requires review of certain Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as may be stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, declared any pending motions moot, and requested that the clerk close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.