Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2022

Geodis USA, Inc. v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-07992
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Geodis USA, Inc. v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd., Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Geodis USA, Inc. and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; the order ended their case based on their reported settlement.

What happened

Geodis USA, Inc. v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. ended after the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs or attorney fees to either party, terminated open motions, and closed the case. The parties had 30 days to ask to reopen the case for good cause or to request that the court retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

Judge Valerie Caproni entered the order on January 14, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Geodis USA, Inc. v. Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. · No. 1:21-cv-07992
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 14, 2022

Background

On January 13, 2022, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of the settlement.

Court’s Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorney fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Reopening and Enforcement

Within 30 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case. The application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement, and a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone. If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, continuing authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.