Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 18, 2022

Lendr.online, LLC v. Mount ETNA Partners LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-00126
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lendr.online v. Mount ETNA Partners, Judge Swain remanded the case because removal was improper and Reincke could not represent other defendants.

Who this affects

Lendr.online, LLC, Mount Etna Partners LLC d/b/a American Fibrex, Risen, Inc., and Garrett Reincke. The federal court's ruling ended the federal action and returned it to the New York Supreme Court in Nassau County; it did not decide the breach-of-contract claims.

What happened

Lendr.online, LLC sued Mount Etna Partners LLC, Risen, Inc., and Garrett Reincke in New York state court over breach-of-contract claims. Reincke, representing himself, filed a notice attempting to move the case to federal court on behalf of all defendants.

The federal court found two problems with the removal. The case came from Nassau County Supreme Court, which is within the federal Eastern District of New York, not the Southern District of New York. Also, Reincke could represent only himself, not the other defendants, because he was not a lawyer.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain remanded the case to New York Supreme Court in Nassau County and closed the federal case. The court did not decide the underlying breach-of-contract claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lendr.online, LLC v. Mount ETNA Partners LLC · No. 1:22-cv-00126
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 18, 2022

Background

In 2020, Lendr.online, LLC filed breach-of-contract claims in Nassau County Supreme Court against Garrett Reincke, Mount Etna Partners LLC doing business as American Fibrex, and Risen, Inc. Reincke, who was representing himself, filed a notice of removal attempting to bring the state-court action to the Southern District of New York. He stated that all defendants consented to removal, although they had not been served. American Fibrex and Risen were not represented by lawyers in the removed action.

Why the Court Remanded the Case

The court held that the removal was improper for two independent reasons. First, federal law permits removal only to the federal district court covering the location of the state court where the case is pending. Because this case was pending in Nassau County, the proper federal district was the Eastern District of New York, not the Southern District of New York.

Second, Reincke could not remove the case on behalf of American Fibrex and Risen. A person who is not a lawyer may represent only that person's own interests and may not appear for other parties. The court therefore concluded that the case could not properly be removed to federal court.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the court remanded the action to the New York Supreme Court, Nassau County. The Clerk was directed to send that court a copy of the order and close the federal action. All pending matters were terminated, and a copy of the order was mailed to Reincke. The court did not reach the merits of Lendr.online's breach-of-contract claims. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.