Flores v. I.C.E.
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-00641
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Carlos Armando Castill Flores v. I.C.E., Chief Judge Swain ordered Flores to pay filing fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.
Carlos Armando Castill Flores and the processing of his civil action; the order required him to pay the filing fees or submit the required application within 30 days.
What happened
Carlos Armando Castill Flores v. I.C.E. concerns a civil case brought by Carlos Armando Castill Flores, who was detained and representing himself. He submitted a complaint and a prisoner authorization but not a completed application to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
The court gave him 30 days from January 26, 2022, to either pay $402 in fees or submit the required application. If approved, the application would allow him to proceed without paying the fees upfront, although the $350 filing fee would be collected from his account in installments. The court did not issue a summons at that time.
The order stated that the case would be processed if Flores complied and would be dismissed if he did not. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order, finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Flores v. I.C.E. · No. 1:22-cv-00641
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 26, 2022
Background
Carlos Armando Castill Flores brought this civil action against I.C.E. while detained at the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility in Batavia, New York. He proceeded without a lawyer. Flores submitted a complaint with a prisoner authorization, but he did not submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying filing fees.
The court’s order
The court ordered Flores, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $402 required to file a civil action, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The application had to be labeled with docket number 22-CV-0641.
The court explained that if Flores’s application were granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act would require collection of the $350 filing fee through installments deducted from his account. The $52 administrative fee would not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees. The prisoner authorization directs the detention facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months.
Disposition
The court did not issue a summons at that time. It stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Flores complied with the order, and that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The Clerk was directed to mail Flores a copy of the order and record service on the docket.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.