Finnegan v. District of Columbia Superior Court
- Laura Swain
- 1:21-cv-10946
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In re Finnegan, Judge Swain held new lawsuits would await a filing-injunction decision and denied IFP status for an appeal.
Sean Matthew Finnegan and any new lawsuits he files before the court resolves the pending show-cause matter; the order also affects his ability to proceed without paying filing fees on an appeal from this order.
What happened
In re Sean Matthew Finnegan concerns six new cases filed while the court was considering whether to bar Sean Matthew Finnegan from filing new lawsuits without permission to proceed without paying fees. The court had ordered him to explain why that restriction should not be imposed, but he had not responded.
The court ordered that any new lawsuit Finnegan files before the pending matter is decided will be held until his time to respond expires. If he does not respond, the filing restriction will take effect as of January 28, 2022. The court also directed the clerk to mail him the order and record service.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not itself decide whether the filing restriction would ultimately be imposed.
The detailed version
- Finnegan v. District of Columbia Superior Court · No. 1:21-cv-10946
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 28, 2022
Background
The court had previously ordered Sean Matthew Finnegan to show cause—meaning to explain—why it should not bar him under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 from filing any new action without first obtaining the court's permission to proceed without paying filing fees. That order followed an earlier dismissal for failure to state a claim and frivolousness. Finnegan had not responded to the show-cause order. Instead, he filed six new cases, identified by docket numbers 22-CV-125, 22-CV-150, 22-CV-210, 22-CV-304, 22-CV-508, and 22-CV-629.
The court's footnote also stated that it had previously warned Finnegan that a filing restriction would be imposed, listed seven earlier cases, and noted that public records showed he had filed dozens of actions in courts across the country. The court stated that Finnegan had filed 17 cases in the Southern District of New York.
Ruling
Until the court decides the pending show-cause matter, any new lawsuit Finnegan files will be held in abeyance—that is, put on hold—until his time to comply with the show-cause order expires. If he fails to comply, the filing injunction will take effect as of January 28, 2022, using the legal term “nunc pro tunc.” The order does not state that the injunction had already taken effect.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. She therefore denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal. The clerk was directed to mail Finnegan a copy of the order and note service on the docket.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.