3A Composites USA Inc. v. Livingston International Inc.
- Denise Cote
- 1:21-cv-06939
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 11
In 3A Composites USA Inc. v. Livingston International Inc., Judge Broderick entered a protective order governing confidential discovery and its use in the litigation.
The parties, their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, vendors, witnesses, experts, mediators, arbitrators, court personnel, and other people with notice of the order who receive or handle confidential discovery material.
What happened
3A Composites USA Inc. v. Livingston International Inc. is a case in which both parties asked the court to protect nonpublic and competitively sensitive information exchanged during discovery. The parties agreed to the order's terms.
The order permits parties to label certain financial, business, technical, personal, and other specified information as confidential. It limits disclosure to listed recipients, requires nondisclosure agreements for some witnesses and experts, and restricts use of the information to this case and related appeals. It also establishes procedures for challenging confidentiality designations, seeking additional protection, filing confidential material with the court, and returning or destroying the material after the case ends.
The court found good cause and entered the stipulated confidentiality and protective order. Judge Vernon S. Broderick signed the order on January 31, 2022; the order also states that the court retained jurisdiction to enforce it.
The detailed version
- 3A Composites USA Inc. v. Livingston International Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-06939
- Denise Cote
- Jan. 31, 2022
Background
The parties jointly requested a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). That rule allows a court, for good cause, to protect parties or persons from harm resulting from discovery. The parties sought protection for nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that might be disclosed during discovery. The court found good cause for an appropriately tailored order governing the pretrial phase of the case.
Confidential information
The order permits a producing party—the party providing discovery—to designate as confidential only material that it reasonably and in good faith believes includes specified types of information. These include nonpublic financial information; previously undisclosed information about ownership or control of a nonpublic company; business plans, marketing and sales information, technical information, trade secrets, proprietary information, customer information, supplier relationships, and related materials; personal or intimate information about an individual; and other categories later given confidential status by the parties or the court.
The order provides procedures for marking documents and portions of deposition transcripts as confidential. A producing party may later designate material that was initially produced without a confidentiality designation, subject to written notice and replacement copies. A confidentiality designation does not waive objections to discovery, privilege, or protection, and does not decide whether material will be admissible at trial.
Who may receive the information
Confidential discovery material may be disclosed only to specified recipients, including the parties and their insurers; counsel and assigned support staff; outside vendors working on the case; mediators or arbitrators; certain people identified on a document; potential witnesses; experts and other specialized advisers; deposition stenographers; and the court and its personnel.
Some recipients, including witnesses, experts, mediators, and arbitrators, must first receive the order and sign a nondisclosure agreement. Counsel must retain those agreements and provide them to opposing counsel ten days before disclosure so that an objection may be raised. Recipients must take reasonable precautions against unauthorized or accidental disclosure and may use the material only to prosecute or defend this action and related appeals.
Court filings and end of the case
The order does not automatically authorize filing confidential material under seal. A party seeking to file such material under seal must follow the court's applicable rules and make the required showing that sealing is essential to protect a higher value and is narrowly tailored. The order warns that the court is unlikely to seal material introduced into evidence at trial merely because it was previously designated confidential.
Parties may object to confidentiality designations or request additional limits on disclosure, such as attorneys'-eyes-only treatment in extraordinary circumstances. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute, they must present it to the court under the applicable individual practices. Within 60 days after final disposition of the action, including appeals, recipients generally must return or destroy confidential material and certify that they have not retained copies or other reproductions. Counsel specifically retained for the case may keep certain archival materials, which remain subject to the order.
The order also addresses inadvertent production of privileged material, stating that such production does not waive the privilege or protection and requiring return and deletion of the material upon written request, subject to a party's right to ask the court to decide whether the material is protected. The order survives termination of the litigation, and the court retains jurisdiction to enforce its obligations and impose contempt sanctions. Judge Vernon S. Broderick entered the stipulated protective order.
Read the full 11-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.