Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2022

Norris v. Mulberry And Grand, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-07440
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Norris v. Mulberry, Judge Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice after the parties reported an agreement resolving all issues.

Who this affects

Namel Norris and the defendants, Mulberry And Grand, Inc. and Bleecker Street Tenants Corp.; the case was closed, subject to the stated 30-day procedures for reopening or requesting retention of jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

What happened

Norris v. Mulberry And Grand, Inc. was dismissed after the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or settlement terms.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It also directed the Clerk to terminate all open motions and close the case, with no costs or attorneys’ fees awarded to either party.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. Within 30 days, the parties may ask to reopen it by showing good cause; they may also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a separate request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Norris v. Mulberry And Grand, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-07440
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 31, 2022

Background

On January 28, 2022, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or the terms of that agreement.

Court’s Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible Reopening and Settlement Enforcement

Within 30 days of the order, the parties may apply to reopen the case. Such an application must show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. A request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied on that basis alone.

The parties may also ask the court to retain jurisdiction—authority to enforce the settlement agreement—if they submit the settlement agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.