Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2022

Green v. ABC Entertainment Inc.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-00376
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Courtney Green v. ABC Entertainment LLC, Judge Swain ordered payment of fees or a corrected application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Courtney Green, who must either pay the filing fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepayment; the case could be dismissed if she does not comply.

What happened

In Courtney Green v. ABC Entertainment LLC, Courtney Green asked to proceed without paying the required filing fees. The court said her application did not fully explain her income, assets, and expenses, including information that differed from applications in other cases.

The court ordered Green, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or submit an amended application with facts showing she cannot pay. The court did not decide whether she qualifies to proceed without prepayment, and no summons would issue at that time. If she did not comply, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order directed the Clerk of Court to mail Green a copy.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Green v. ABC Entertainment Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00376
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 1, 2022

Background

Courtney Green brought this action without a lawyer and submitted an application asking to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The court explained that the fees were $402: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee.

Green’s application stated that she was last employed on April 17, 2021, with gross monthly income of $2,000. She reported no income from the listed sources, wrote that she paid expenses with “left over unemployment,” reported no money in the bank, no property of value, and no expenses. The court found that these answers did not fully explain her current sources of income or how she paid her expenses.

The court also referred to information from Green’s applications in several other federal cases filed in late December 2021 and January 2022. In those applications, she had reported different employment and unemployment-benefit information. The court used that information in explaining why it could not determine whether Green had enough money to pay the filing fees.

Order

The court directed Green, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The amended application had to be signed, labeled with docket number 22-CV-0376 (LTS), and provide facts addressing the deficiencies identified by the court. The court did not grant or deny the amended application because Green had not yet submitted it.

No summons would issue at that time. If Green complied with the order, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If she failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Green permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Green a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.