Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2022

7 West 21 LI LLC v. Mosseri

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:21-cv-05621
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissPro Se
In one sentence

In 7 West 21 LI LLC v. Mosseri, Judge Cronan denied Mosseri’s motion to dismiss without prejudice because removal requirements and federal jurisdiction were unresolved.

Who this affects

Clement Mosseri, who was proceeding without a lawyer, must provide the required removal materials or face remand of the case to state court. 7 West 21 LI LLC is the plaintiff in the removed action.

What happened

In 7 West 21 LI LLC v. Mosseri, Clement Mosseri removed a state-court holdover proceeding to federal court but did not provide the required explanation for removal or copies of the state-court papers served on him. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered him to file those materials.

Instead of following that order, Mosseri filed a motion to dismiss and appealed the order. The Second Circuit dismissed his appeal on January 31, 2022.

Judge John P. Cronan denied Mosseri’s motion to dismiss without prejudice because Mosseri had not followed the earlier order or established federal jurisdiction. The court gave him 30 days to provide the required materials and stated that the case would be sent back to state court if he did not. The court also denied him permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
7 West 21 LI LLC v. Mosseri · No. 1:21-cv-05621
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Feb. 1, 2022

Background

Clement Mosseri removed a state-court holdover proceeding to federal court. On July 7, 2021, Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Mosseri to file a declaration meeting the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). That law requires a person removing a state case to provide a short and plain statement explaining the grounds for removal, along with copies of all process, pleadings, and orders served in the state case.

Chief Judge Swain found that Mosseri’s notice of removal did not meet those requirements. It asserted, without factual support, that the underlying holdover proceeding duplicated another proceeding. She warned that the case would be sent back to state court if Mosseri did not comply by August 7, 2021, or show good cause for failing to do so.

Procedural History

After the case was assigned to Judge Cronan, Mosseri filed a motion to dismiss instead of complying with the July 7 order. He also filed a notice of appeal from that order. The Second Circuit dismissed the appeal on January 31, 2022.

Ruling

Judge Cronan denied Mosseri’s motion to dismiss without prejudice because Mosseri had not complied with the July 7 order and had not established the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction, meaning its legal authority to hear the case. The court directed Mosseri to file the required declaration and state-court documents within 30 days, by March 3, 2022. It stated that the case would be remanded to state court without further notice if he failed to do so.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion. It also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Mosseri permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The opinion identifies Mosseri as proceeding without a lawyer.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.