Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 2, 2022

Rodriguez v. Manzi

Judge
Judith McCarthy
Docket
7:21-cv-07438
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaClass ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Manzi, Judge Briccetti ordered counsel to seek court approval of a reported settlement in an FLSA case by March 2, 2022.

Who this affects

The parties and the other people Rodriguez sought to represent in the Fair Labor Standards Act case; counsel were ordered to submit the settlement-approval application.

What happened

In Rodriguez v. Manzi, Israel Rodriguez sued 6 South Broadway Corp., doing business as River City Grille, and Robert Manzi in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. Rodriguez brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

The court was told that the parties had reached a settlement. It ordered counsel to submit an application asking the court to approve the settlement by March 2, 2022, as required by Second Circuit precedent.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued the February 2, 2022 order. The opinion does not approve or reject the settlement; it only directs counsel to submit the approval application.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Manzi · No. 7:21-cv-07438
Judge
Judith McCarthy
Date
Feb. 2, 2022

Background

Israel Rodriguez sued 6 South Broadway Corp., doing business as River City Grille, and Robert Manzi. The caption states that Rodriguez sued individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The court describes the matter as a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Order

The court stated that it had been advised that the parties had reached a settlement. It ordered counsel to submit an application for court approval of the settlement by March 2, 2022. The order cited Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), as requiring approval of the settlement.

Result

The order does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement, and it does not enter judgment. It directs counsel to submit the required settlement-approval application.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.