Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 3, 2022

Hernandez v. City of New York

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:18-cv-06418
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Summary JudgmentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hernandez v. City of New York, Judge Woods granted Defendants’ summary-judgment motions, entered judgment for them, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Angel Hernandez and Ana Garcia, whose case ended with judgment in favor of Defendants; the judgment also denied them permission to appeal without paying court fees.

What happened

The judgment in Hernandez v. City of New York concerns Angel Hernandez and Ana Garcia’s case against the City of New York and the other named defendants. The judgment itself does not describe the claims or the underlying events.

The court stated that, for the reasons in its February 2, 2022 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted. Judgment was entered in favor of Defendants, and the case was closed.

Judge Woods is identified as the judge. The court also denied the plaintiffs permission to appeal without paying court fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hernandez v. City of New York · No. 1:18-cv-06418
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Feb. 3, 2022

Disposition

The court granted Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. Summary judgment is a decision resolving claims without a trial when the governing standard is satisfied. The judgment states that the reasons for this ruling appear in the court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated February 2, 2022. That memorandum is not included in the provided text, so the judgment does not reveal the claims, evidence, or legal reasoning underlying the decision.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status—that is, permission to appeal without paying the required court fees—for purposes of an appeal.

Case status

Judgment was entered for Defendants, and the case was closed. The named plaintiffs are Angel Hernandez and Ana Garcia. The named defendants are the City of New York, Manuel Siles, P.O. Shield #844, Omar Habib, P.O. Shield #844, and Diego Beekman Mutual Housing.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.