Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 9, 2022

Wonzer v. Hernandez

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:20-cv-10836
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Wonzer v. Hernandez, Judge John P. Cronan’s court granted leave to file certain papers under seal.

Who this affects

The parties, including the plaintiffs and the defendant, whose specified submissions were the subject of the request to file papers under seal.

What happened

In Wonzer v. Hernandez, the plaintiffs asked the court for permission to file certain papers under seal in connection with submissions due for an upcoming inquest. The letter was addressed to Judge John P. Cronan, and the defendant agreed to the request.

The requested papers included the plaintiffs’ medical records and the defendant’s and his companies’ tax returns and bank statements. The letter cited other federal court decisions involving sealed medical and financial records.

The court granted the parties leave to file certain papers under seal. The order was dated February 9, 2022, and the text identifies Judge John P. Cronan as the judge to whom the motion was addressed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wonzer v. Hernandez · No. 1:20-cv-10836
Judge
John P. Cronan
Date
Feb. 9, 2022

Background

The plaintiffs submitted a letter motion under the court’s individual rules seeking permission to file certain papers under seal. The request concerned submissions for an inquest that were due on February 11, 2022. The defendant consented to the request.

Requested Documents

The plaintiffs requested permission to file their medical records under seal. They also requested permission to file the defendant’s and his companies’ tax returns and bank statements under seal. The letter cited decisions discussing privacy interests in medical records and the confidentiality of financial information.

Ruling

The court granted the letter motion. It granted the parties leave to file certain papers under seal. The order does not separately identify which specific documents were authorized for sealing beyond that general description.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.