Anekwe v. Bernstein
- Loretta Preska
- 1:21-cv-11108
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Anekwe v. Bernstein, Judge Preska ordered U.S. Marshals to serve defendants in a prisoner’s constitutional-rights lawsuit.
Peter Anekwe, Frederick Bernstein, and Albert Acrish. The order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Bernstein and Acrish.
What happened
Anekwe v. Bernstein concerns Peter Anekwe’s lawsuit under a federal civil-rights law against Frederick Bernstein and Albert Acrish. Anekwe alleges that they violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility.
The court explained that Anekwe had permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance and therefore could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to deliver the summonses and complaint. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.
Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summonses, prepare service forms, and provide the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The order also instructed Anekwe to notify the court of any address change.
The detailed version
- Anekwe v. Bernstein · No. 1:21-cv-11108
- Loretta Preska
- Feb. 11, 2022
Background
Peter Anekwe, who was incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that Medical Director Frederick Bernstein and Medical Provider Albert Acrish violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility.
Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain had previously granted Anekwe permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance. Because Anekwe was proceeding this way, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.
Service of the lawsuit
The court explained that the usual rule requires service of the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed. But Anekwe could not have served the documents before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses to be issued. The court therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses are issued.
The court stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Anekwe should ask for an extension of time. It also instructed Anekwe to notify the court in writing if his address changes and warned that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.
Ruling
Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for Bernstein and Acrish, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, and send the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service for service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Anekwe a copy of the order and an information package. The opinion does not decide whether Anekwe’s constitutional-rights allegations are valid.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.