Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 24, 2022

Iroakazi v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:18-cv-08193-VB-AEK
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Iroakazi v. Kijakazi, Judge Briccetti granted Iroakazi’s motion, denied the Commissioner’s motion, and remanded the Social Security case.

Who this affects

Iroakazi and the Social Security Administration; the case returns to the agency for further administrative proceedings.

What happened

In Iroakazi v. Kijakazi, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning both sides’ requests for judgment based on the written record. The recommendation found that the administrative law judge made legal errors when evaluating the opinions of Iroakazi’s treating physician and an expert witness.

Neither side objected to the recommendation. After reviewing it and the underlying record, the court found no error and adopted the recommendation.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti granted Iroakazi’s motion, denied the defendant’s motion, and remanded the case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. The clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Iroakazi v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 7:18-cv-08193-VB-AEK
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Feb. 24, 2022

Background

The court considered Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause’s February 4, 2022 Report and Recommendation concerning the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). The recommendation concluded that the administrative law judge committed legal errors by failing to properly apply the treating physician rule to the opinions of Iroakazi’s treating physician, Dr. Joseph Squitieri, and by assigning significant weight to the opinion of expert witness Dr. Edward N. Halperin. It recommended granting Iroakazi’s motion, denying the defendant’s motion, and remanding the case to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings.

The opinion states that Kilolo Kijakazi was substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation and the underlying record for error and found no error, clear or otherwise.

Ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti adopted the Report and Recommendation as the court’s opinion. Iroakazi’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted, and the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied. The case was remanded to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings consistent with the recommendation under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. The clerk was instructed to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.