Hernandez Leonardo v. Reza Fast Food, Inc.
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:20-cv-08879
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Hernandez Leonardo v. Reza Fast Food, Inc., Judge Broderick ordered the parties to submit their FLSA settlement for fairness review.
The parties to the FLSA case—Jose Luis Hernandez Leonardo, Yonic Hernandez, Reza Fast Food, Inc., and Adel Ejtemai—must submit the settlement materials required by the order.
What happened
In Hernandez Leonardo v. Reza Fast Food, Inc., Jose Luis Hernandez Leonardo and Yonic Hernandez told the court that they had reached a settlement with Reza Fast Food, Inc. and Adel Ejtemai in a Fair Labor Standards Act case.
The court said the parties must provide the settlement terms and explain why the agreement is fair and reasonable. Their explanation must address factors including possible recovery, litigation costs and risks, the parties’ negotiations, and possible fraud or collusion.
Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the parties to submit the settlement terms within 30 days, along with a joint letter of no more than five pages. If the agreement includes attorney’s fees, they must also provide records supporting the requested fees.
The detailed version
- Hernandez Leonardo v. Reza Fast Food, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-08879
- Vernon Broderick
- Feb. 25, 2022
Background
Jose Luis Hernandez Leonardo and Yonic Hernandez sued Reza Fast Food, Inc., doing business as Crown Fried Chicken, and Adel Ejtemai under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court was advised that the parties had reached a settlement.
Legal standard
The court explained that parties generally cannot privately settle FLSA claims with prejudice without approval from the district court or the Department of Labor. The court must determine whether the settlement is fair and reasonable by considering the total circumstances, including the plaintiffs’ possible recovery, the burdens and expenses the settlement would avoid, the litigation risks, whether experienced counsel negotiated at arm’s length, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
If the settlement includes attorney’s fees, the court must separately assess whether those fees are reasonable. The parties must provide a factual basis for any fee award, including billing records showing each attorney’s date of work, hours spent, and work performed.
Order
The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement terms within 30 days so it could determine whether they comply with the FLSA and represent a reasonable compromise of disputed issues. The parties must also submit a joint letter of no more than five pages explaining why they believe the settlement is fair and reasonable, including information about the five listed factors. If the settlement includes attorney’s fees, the parties must submit supporting evidence and contemporaneous billing records.
This order required additional submissions; the opinion does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.