Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 11, 2022

Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-08181
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp., Judge Broderick approved the parties’ fair Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The order affects the Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Plaintiffs’ counsel by approving their FLSA settlement, its limited release, and the attorneys’ fee payment.

What happened

In Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp., the parties reached a settlement in a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The court had earlier found discrepancies in the parties’ first settlement submission and directed them to revise it or abandon the settlement.

The revised agreement provides Plaintiffs with $12,000, including attorneys’ fees and expenses, paid in 12 installments of $1,000. Although this was less than Plaintiffs’ estimated total damages, it exceeded their estimated unpaid back wages. The agreement also contains a release limited to wage-and-hour claims arising during the period covered by the lawsuit.

The court found the settlement and the requested attorneys’ fees fair and reasonable and approved the settlement. Judge Vernon S. Broderick also found that the fee request of $4,413 was reasonable.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-08181
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Apr. 11, 2022

Background

The parties advised the court that they had reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case. Because the parties had not obtained approval from the Department of Labor, the court reviewed the proposed settlement to determine whether it was fair and reasonable. The court had previously found discrepancies between the parties’ first supporting letter and the settlement agreement, and directed them either to submit a revised agreement and explanation or to state that they were abandoning the settlement. The parties submitted a revised agreement and joint supporting letter on April 4, 2022.

Settlement Amount

The agreement provides Plaintiffs with $12,000, inclusive of attorneys’ fees and expenses. Counsel represented that Plaintiffs believed they were entitled to $10,844.78 in back wages and $35,076.56 in total damages. The settlement amount was less than the estimated total recovery but represented more than 100% of the estimated back wages. The parties represented that Defendants vigorously contested Plaintiffs’ allegations, including the number of hours Plaintiffs allegedly worked, and that the settlement resulted from arm’s-length negotiations at a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. The agreement itself provides for 12 installments of $1,000 each, although the parties’ supporting letter referred to one installment. The court stated that the agreement’s text controlled and found the settlement amount fair and reasonable.

Release

The agreement requires Plaintiffs to release Defendants from wage-and-hour allegations and claims that arose during the period covered by the litigation. The court found that the release was appropriately limited to the claims at issue in the action.

Attorneys’ Fees

Plaintiffs’ counsel reported $13,557.50 in accrued attorneys’ fees and $620 in costs but requested $4,413 in total, representing one-third of the settlement amount plus filing and service-of-process fees. The court noted that courts regularly approve fees equal to one-third of an FLSA settlement. It also considered the work counsel performed, including initial fact-gathering, preparing and filing the complaint, evaluating damages, and preparing for mediation. The court concluded that the requested amount was reasonable and was only a fraction of counsel’s reported lodestar—the standard calculation based on reasonable hourly rates and hours worked.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick found the settlement terms, release, and attorneys’ fees fair and reasonable. The court therefore approved the settlement agreement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.