Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 25, 2022

Finnegan v. CVS

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-00150
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Finnegan v. CVS, Judge Swain ordered Finnegan to pay fees or submit a complete fee-waiver application within 30 days.

Who this affects

Sean Matthew Finnegan, who must either pay the court fees or submit a complete amended application within 30 days; CVS is the named defendant in the action.

What happened

In Finnegan v. CVS, Sean Matthew Finnegan filed the case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the court fees upfront. His application did not answer several financial questions or explain his income and expenses well enough for the court to decide whether he could pay.

The court ordered Finnegan, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit an amended application answering all questions about his current finances. No summons would issue yet, and the court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied fee-waiver status for an appeal, finding that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Finnegan v. CVS · No. 1:22-cv-00150
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 25, 2022

Background

Sean Matthew Finnegan brought the action without a lawyer. To proceed with a civil action in the Southern District of New York, he had to either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Finnegan submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, but the court found that it was incomplete. He did not answer the question asking for his employer’s name and address if he was employed. Although he reported zero gross monthly wages and zero take-home pay, he did not answer several other questions about his financial situation. He also answered a question about debts or financial obligations with the word “Medical.”

Court’s Analysis

The court held that Finnegan had not provided enough information about his income or how he paid his expenses. Because of those omissions, the court could not determine whether he had sufficient funds to pay the filing fees and therefore could not rule on his application.

Order

The court ordered Finnegan to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application had to answer all questions as they applied to his current financial situation and provide facts showing that he could not pay the fees. If the court granted the amended application, Finnegan would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

No summons would issue at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Finnegan complied. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Finnegan and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.