Glass v. First Rail Response
- Denise Cote
- 1:21-cv-00984
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Glass v. First Rail Response, Judge Cote discontinued the settled case, allowing restoration by April 1, 2022, after which dismissal would be with prejudice.
Lynn Glass, First Rail Response, and Edward Herbst.
What happened
Lynn Glass sued First Rail Response and Edward Herbst. The opinion states that the parties reported the case had been settled.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party. It allowed the case to be returned to the court’s calendar if an application was made by April 1, 2022.
Judge Cote ordered that if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored under that order.
The detailed version
- Glass v. First Rail Response · No. 1:21-cv-00984
- Denise Cote
- Mar. 2, 2022
Background
The court stated that it had been informed that the case had been settled. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or the underlying claims.
Ruling
Judge Denise Cote ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed either party to seek restoration of the action to the court’s calendar by April 1, 2022. If no application to restore the action was made by that date, the order provided that the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect of the Order
The order ended the case subject to the stated deadline for seeking restoration. It did not decide the merits of the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.