Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2022

Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-00378
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916, Judge Briccetti ordered Stewart to choose whether to amend his complaint or proceed against dismissal.

Who this affects

Kevin Stewart and the Eastchester Fire District; the order also concerns the pending case involving Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916.

What happened

In Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916, the Eastchester Fire District asked the court to dismiss Stewart’s complaint under a rule for claims that allegedly do not state a valid legal claim.

The court did not decide that dismissal request. Instead, it ordered Stewart to tell the court by March 14, 2022, whether he would file an amended complaint or rely on his existing complaint.

Judge Briccetti said that if Stewart amended his complaint, he had 14 days after notifying the court to file it. The Eastchester Fire District would then have 21 days to answer, seek dismissal, or rely on its original motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916 · No. 7:22-cv-00378
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Mar. 2, 2022

Background

On March 1, 2022, defendant The Eastchester Fire District filed a motion to dismiss Kevin Stewart’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which concerns whether a complaint adequately states a legal claim. The opinion does not describe the claims or the alleged deficiencies in the complaint.

Court’s action

The court ordered Stewart to notify it by March 14, 2022, whether he intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion or would rely on the complaint already subject to the motion. The court stated that, if Stewart chose not to amend, the motion would proceed under the regular briefing schedule and that the court was unlikely to grant another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies apparent from the fully briefed motion.

If Stewart chose to amend, the court required him to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, the Eastchester Fire District could file an answer, file a new motion to dismiss, or notify the court that it would rely on its initial motion. The court stated that the briefing deadlines would otherwise be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Southern District of New York’s local rules.

Disposition and significance

The court did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss in this order. It issued a case-management order requiring Stewart to choose between amending his complaint and proceeding with the existing complaint. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order on March 2, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.