Thomas v. Arts in Common LLC
- Sarah Cave
- 1:21-cv-06948
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Thomas v. Arts in Common LLC, Judge Cave ordered the parties to submit materials supporting review of their wage-settlement agreement.
Daria Thomas, the proposed Fair Labor Standards Act collective, Arts in Common LLC, Rafael Baccus, and their attorneys.
What happened
Thomas v. Arts in Common LLC is a wage case involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, brought by Daria Thomas for herself and others. The parties had consented to have a federal magistrate judge handle the case.
Because the case involved Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion explaining whether their settlement was fair and reasonable. The filing had to discuss the claims and defenses, potential damages, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the settlement process, and other relevant considerations.
The court also required information about the attorneys’ fees, including any fee agreement, billing records, and costs, along with a copy of the settlement agreement. Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the materials filed by March 18, 2022; the order did not approve or reject the settlement.
The detailed version
- Thomas v. Arts in Common LLC · No. 1:21-cv-06948
- Sarah Cave
- Mar. 4, 2022
Background
Daria Thomas brought this case on behalf of herself and others in a proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The defendants are Arts in Common LLC and Rafael Baccus. On February 18, 2022, the parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge for all purposes.
The opinion states that the parties had a settlement requiring review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. That precedent requires court consideration of whether a settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act claims is fair and reasonable.
Court’s Order
The court ordered the parties to file a joint letter-motion by March 18, 2022. The letter-motion must address:
- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of Thomas’s case and the defendants’ defenses; - any reasons for a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and settlement-negotiation process; and - other matters relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment could be collected after trial.
The parties must also explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach any retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney fees incurred—including billing records and documentation of costs—and attach the settlement agreement itself.
Disposition and Effect
The court ordered submission of settlement materials. It did not approve or reject the settlement in this order, and the opinion does not decide the underlying wage claims. The order was signed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave on March 4, 2022.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.