Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2022

Jameson v. Dickson

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-01634
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rosado Jameson v. Joseph A. Dickson, Judge Swain transferred the pro se constitutional-claims case to New Jersey for improper venue.

Who this affects

Rosado Jameson's case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the District of New Jersey. The New Jersey court will decide whether he may proceed without prepaying filing fees.

What happened

Rosado Jameson sued Joseph A. Dickson and three other defendants, asserting constitutional claims under the Second and Fourth Amendments. Jameson represented himself, and the complaint concerned events in New Jersey.

The court found that the Southern District of New York was not the proper venue because Jameson did not allege that the defendants lived there or that substantial events occurred there. The court concluded that venue was proper in the District of New Jersey, where the events occurred and where the defendants likely lived.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the District of New Jersey under the federal venue statute. The Southern District of New York closed the case, left any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees to the New Jersey court, and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jameson v. Dickson · No. 1:22-cv-01634
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 4, 2022

Background

Rosado Jameson, proceeding without a lawyer, brought constitutional claims under the Second and Fourth Amendments. The defendants were Joseph A. Dickson, a former magistrate judge of the District of New Jersey; Jerry Sanseberino, a deputy United States marshal for that district; Sergeant E. Stentella of the Carteret, New Jersey Police Department; and Officer Mike Kelly of the same department. Jameson alleged that the events underlying the claims occurred in New Jersey and listed New Jersey work addresses for the defendants.

Venue Analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), the general federal venue statute. That statute allows a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the relevant events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The court concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because Jameson did not allege that any defendant resided there or that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there.

The court determined that venue was proper in the District of New Jersey because the underlying events occurred there and the defendants likely resided there. It therefore ordered the action transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer when a case is filed in the wrong venue.

Ruling and Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Jameson could proceed without prepaying fees. It also directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York and stated that the order closed the case there. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.