Davila v. Intren LLC
- Gregory Woods
- 1:22-cv-01558
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Davila v. Intren LLC, Judge Woods remanded the case because defendants did not establish federal diversity jurisdiction.
Marisol Davila, Intren LLC, and Brett William SparengerG; the case was returned to New York state court and the federal case was closed.
What happened
Davila v. Intren LLC began in New York state court and was moved to federal court by Intren LLC and Brett William SparengerG. The defendants claimed that the federal court had authority because the parties were citizens of different states and more than $75,000 was at stake.
The court warned that the removal papers did not identify the citizenship of Intren LLC’s members, which was necessary to determine whether the parties were completely diverse. The defendants supplied evidence about the amount in dispute but did not provide the missing citizenship information.
Judge Gregory H. Woods ruled that the defendants had not established federal subject-matter jurisdiction. He remanded the case to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, and directed the Clerk to close the federal case.
The detailed version
- Davila v. Intren LLC · No. 1:22-cv-01558
- Gregory Woods
- Mar. 7, 2022
Background
Marisol Davila sued Intren LLC and Brett William SparengerG in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The defendants removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. They asserted federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, claiming that the parties were citizens of different states and that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000.
Jurisdictional Defect
A defendant removing a case to federal court has the burden of showing that removal is proper. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity, meaning that every defendant must be a citizen of a different state from every plaintiff. For a limited liability company, citizenship is determined by the citizenship of each member.
The court issued an order directing the defendants to explain why the case should not be remanded because the removal notice did not properly allege the citizenship of Intren LLC’s members. The defendants responded with evidence intended to show that more than $75,000 was in dispute, but they did not provide information about the citizenship of Intren LLC’s members. The opinion therefore states that the defendants had not established complete diversity or federal subject-matter jurisdiction.
Ruling
Because the defendants had not established subject-matter jurisdiction, Judge Gregory H. Woods remanded the matter to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The Clerk of Court was directed to remand the matter without delay and close the federal case. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.