Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 14, 2022

Jacques v. Imperial Parking, Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-07102
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Jacques v. Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc., Judge Schofield required settlement documents and canceled conferences and deadlines.

Who this affects

The parties to the case were required to submit settlement materials by April 15, 2022. All scheduled conferences were canceled, and all deadlines were postponed indefinitely.

What happened

In Jacques v. Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc., the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement agreement in principle.

The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint letter with evidence supporting approval of the settlement as fair and reasonable by April 15, 2022.

Judge Schofield canceled all conferences and postponed all deadlines indefinitely; the order did not decide the underlying dispute or approve the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jacques v. Imperial Parking, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-07102
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 14, 2022

Background

The court was informed on March 11, 2022, that the parties had reached a settlement agreement in principle. The opinion does not state the settlement's terms or describe the underlying claims.

Order

The court ordered the parties to submit by April 15, 2022: (1) the settlement agreement, and (2) a joint letter with supporting evidence addressing the findings needed for the court to approve the settlement as fair and reasonable. The court cited decisions describing factors used to evaluate proposed settlements.

The court also canceled all conferences and adjourned, or postponed indefinitely, all deadlines. The order did not approve the settlement or resolve the merits of the parties' dispute.

Disposition

This was a procedural order concerning the proposed settlement and case scheduling. Judge Schofield did not enter a final ruling on the parties' underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.