Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 21, 2024

Dolce v. Pezzola

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-10049
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedureContractPro Se
In one sentence

In Dolce v. Pezzola, Judge Schofield dismissed claims against eight defendants and ordered service on three others in a contract case.

Who this affects

Seth Dolce’s claims against Charles Kremer, Leo Kremer, Oliver Kremer, Frank Racioppi, Atlas Asset Management, Perseus Holdings II LLC, Perseus Holdings IV, and Cameleo, LLC were dismissed. The claims against David Pezzola, Icarus Investment Group, and American Street Capital, LLC remained subject to service through the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Dolce v. Pezzola, Seth Dolce, representing himself, brought a state-law contract claim under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. The court had already allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

The court dismissed the claims against Charles Kremer, Leo Kremer, Oliver Kremer, Frank Racioppi, Atlas Asset Management, Perseus Holdings II LLC, Perseus Holdings IV, and Cameleo, LLC, because the amended complaint did not state facts showing their involvement. The case continues against David Pezzola, Icarus Investment Group, and American Street Capital, LLC, for whom the court ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to issue and serve summonses.

Judge Schofield also extended the service deadline to 90 days after summonses are issued and denied permission to proceed without fees on any appeal from this order. The order does not state whether the dismissals were with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dolce v. Pezzola · No. 1:23-cv-10049
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Feb. 21, 2024

Background

Seth Dolce, who is representing himself, brought a state-law breach-of-contract claim under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain had previously allowed Dolce to proceed without paying court fees upfront.

Screening of the claims

Because Dolce was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court was required to review the amended complaint and dismiss any portion that was frivolous, malicious, failed to state a claim for relief, or sought money from an immune defendant. The court also had to dismiss the case if it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. In reviewing a self-represented person’s filing, the court said it would read the pleading liberally and consider the strongest arguments suggested by it.

The court found that the amended complaint stated no facts about the involvement of Charles Kremer, Leo Kremer, Oliver Kremer, Frank Racioppi, Atlas Asset Management, Perseus Holdings II LLC, Perseus Holdings IV, or Cameleo, LLC. The court said it was unclear why Dolce had named these individuals and entities as defendants. It therefore dismissed Dolce’s claims against all eight for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Service on remaining defendants

The court did not dismiss the claims against David Pezzola, Icarus Investment Group, or American Street Capital, LLC in this order. Because Dolce was allowed to proceed without paying fees, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve those defendants. The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete the required service forms with the defendants’ addresses, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service.

The court stated that the amended complaint must be served within 90 days after the summonses are issued. It also stated that Dolce should request an extension if service is not completed within that period. The order warned that Dolce must notify the court if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Conclusion and appeal status

Judge Schofield dismissed the claims against the eight defendants listed above and instructed the Clerk to issue summonses for Pezzola, Icarus Investment Group, and American Street Capital, LLC. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not state whether the dismissals were with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.