Maione v. Zucker
- 7:18-cv-07452
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Maione v. Zucker, the court granted both motions, dismissing claims against Sherwood without prejudice and all others with prejudice.
Scott Maione, Tasha Ostler, their three infant children, Defendant Sherwood, and the remaining defendants. Claims against Sherwood were dismissed without prejudice; claims against the remaining defendants were dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
In Maione v. Zucker, the court entered judgment after referring to its Opinion and Order dated March 15, 2022. The judgment says both motions were granted in full.
The court dismissed all claims against Defendant Sherwood without prejudice, meaning they were not barred from being filed again by this judgment. It dismissed all claims against the remaining defendants with prejudice, meaning those claims were barred from being filed again. The judgment does not explain the underlying reasons; it refers to the earlier Opinion and Order.
The judgment was entered by the court on March 15, 2022. The document names Ruby J. Krajick as Clerk of Court and does not identify a judge, so the ruling is attributed to the court.
The detailed version
- Maione v. Zucker · No. 7:18-cv-07452
- Mar. 15, 2022
Order
The judgment states that, for the reasons given in the court’s Opinion and Order dated March 15, 2022, both motions were granted in full.
Disposition
The court dismissed all claims against Defendant Sherwood without prejudice. This means the judgment did not bar those claims from being brought again. The court dismissed all claims against the remaining defendants with prejudice, which bars those claims from being brought again. The judgment does not identify the motions or describe the underlying legal analysis; it refers to the earlier Opinion and Order for the reasons.
Court and entry
The judgment is dated March 15, 2022, and was entered by Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court, by Deputy Clerk K. Mango. The document does not name a judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.