Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 17, 2022

Fritz v. Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-04727
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fritz v. Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC, Judge Schofield approved the settlement, awarded fees and costs, and closed the case.

Who this affects

The settlement parties, Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs’ counsel were affected. Plaintiffs’ counsel received $14,009.00 in fees and $472.00 in costs, and the remaining settlement funds were to be distributed to Plaintiffs.

What happened

In Fritz v. Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC, the parties submitted a settlement agreement for court approval. They initially did not provide time records or an expense breakdown, but Plaintiffs’ counsel later submitted those materials.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable. It granted Plaintiffs’ counsel $14,009 in fees and $472 in costs, and ordered the remaining settlement funds distributed to Plaintiffs.

Judge Schofield directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fritz v. Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC · No. 1:21-cv-04727
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 17, 2022

Background

On February 17, 2022, the parties filed a joint letter and settlement agreement. The filing did not include contemporaneous time records or a breakdown of Plaintiffs’ counsel’s expenses. On March 14, 2022, Plaintiffs’ counsel submitted a supplemental letter with time records and a fee breakdown to support the request for attorneys’ fees and expenses.

Rulings

The court approved the settlement agreement as fair and reasonable, considering the nature and scope of Plaintiffs’ claims and the risks and expenses of additional litigation.

The court granted Plaintiffs’ counsel’s request for $14,009.00 in attorneys’ fees, excluding costs. The court noted that this amount was less than the lodestar calculation—the product of a reasonable hourly rate and the reasonable number of hours required—and was approximately one-third of the settlement. The court also granted the request for $472.00 in costs.

The court ordered that the remainder of the settlement be distributed to Plaintiffs and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. Judge Schofield’s order approved the settlement and related fees and costs; the opinion does not state the underlying claims’ specific legal theories or decide their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.