Sanderson v. Voss Events, Inc.
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-02550
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Sanderson v. Voss Events, Judge Swain ordered Sanderson to pay $402 or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.
Matthew Sanderson and the processing of his civil action against Voss Events, Inc. and New York Spaces, Inc.
What happened
In Sanderson v. Voss Events, Inc., Matthew Sanderson filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them. He was representing himself.
The court gave Sanderson 30 days to pay $402, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. If the court approves that application, he may proceed without paying the fees in advance. No summons would issue at that time.
The court said the action would be dismissed if Sanderson did not comply within 30 days. Judge Swain also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Sanderson v. Voss Events, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02550
- Laura Swain
- Apr. 1, 2022
Background
Matthew Sanderson, identified in the caption as also known professionally as Detox, brought the action against Voss Events, Inc. and New York Spaces, Inc. The opinion states that Sanderson was representing himself. He submitted a complaint but did not pay the required fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.
Court’s Order
The court explained that a civil plaintiff must either pay $402—composed of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed IFP application under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court ordered Sanderson, within 30 days of the order, to do one of those two things. If he submitted the application, it had to identify docket number 22-CV-2550 (LTS). If the court granted the application, Sanderson could proceed without paying the fees in advance.
The court directed that no summons issue at that time. It stated that the case would be processed through the Clerk’s Office if Sanderson complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.
Appeal and Disposition
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion is an administrative and procedural order about payment of filing fees or submission of an IFP application; it does not address the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.