Bazelais v. New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision
- Laura Swain
- 1:22-cv-02773
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Bazelais v. New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Judge Swain ordered payment or authorization for installment fees before the case proceeds.
Wilner Bazelais, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the authorization for installment payments before the action can proceed.
What happened
In Bazelais v. New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Wilner Bazelais filed a civil case while incarcerated and asked to proceed without paying the fees upfront.
The court said Bazelais had submitted the application to proceed without upfront payment but had not submitted the required authorization allowing installment deductions from his prison account.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Bazelais, within 30 days, to pay $402 or submit the authorization. No summons would issue yet, and the court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.
The detailed version
- Bazelais v. New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision · No. 1:22-cv-02773
- Laura Swain
- Apr. 5, 2022
Background
Wilner Bazelais, who was incarcerated at the George R. Vierno Center and represented himself, filed this civil action. A prisoner must either pay the required filing and administrative fees or request permission to proceed without paying them upfront by submitting an application and a prisoner authorization.
Bazelais submitted the application to proceed without upfront payment, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization. That authorization directs the facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from the prisoner’s account in installments and to provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months. The $52 administrative fee does not apply when the court grants permission to proceed without upfront payment.
Order
The court ordered Bazelais, within 30 days of the order, either to pay $402 in fees or to complete and submit the prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 22-CV-2773 (LTS). The court did not issue a summons at that time. It stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Bazelais complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without upfront payment for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of Bazelais’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.