Guzman v. United States Postal Service
- Lewis Kaplan
- 1:21-cv-04415
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Guzman v. United States Postal Service, Judge Lehrburger adjourned the initial conference while the Government prepared a jurisdictional motion.
Guzman, the United States Postal Service, Raymond Polanco, and the parties’ pretrial schedule and discovery timing.
What happened
Guzman v. United States Postal Service is a Federal Tort Claims Act case arising from a December 2019 car accident. The Government represents the Postal Service and Raymond Polanco.
The Government asked to postpone the initial pretrial conference, which was scheduled for April 18, 2022. It said it intended to ask for dismissal because Guzman allegedly had not properly presented his claim to the Postal Service before filing the lawsuit. Guzman consented to postponing the conference.
The court ordered the conference postponed until after the Government’s planned motion is resolved, so discovery would not begin prematurely. The order was signed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger.
The detailed version
- Guzman v. United States Postal Service · No. 1:21-cv-04415
- Lewis Kaplan
- Apr. 8, 2022
Background
This Federal Tort Claims Act case concerns a December 2019 car accident. The United States Attorney’s Office stated that it represents the United States Postal Service and Raymond Polanco, together called the “Government.” The Government had accepted service of the complaint by email on March 17, 2022. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(2), it stated that its deadline to answer or otherwise respond was May 16, 2022.
Requested postponement
The Government asked to postpone the initial pretrial conference, scheduled for April 18, 2022, without setting a new date. It stated that it intended to file a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). The stated basis was that Guzman allegedly had not adequately presented his claim to the Postal Service before filing the lawsuit, as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Government also said the parties agreed that beginning discovery before the motion was resolved would be premature. Guzman consented to the request.
Ruling
The court ordered the initial pretrial conference postponed until after the Government’s motion is resolved. The text provided does not show that the Government had filed that motion or that the court decided whether the claim satisfied the Federal Tort Claims Act’s presentment requirement. United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger signed the order.
Effect
The ruling concerns the timing of the initial conference and discovery. It does not decide the Government’s proposed jurisdictional challenge or the underlying accident claim.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.