Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 12, 2022

Perez v. Deprospo

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-02866
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perez v. Deprospo, Judge Swain ordered the detained plaintiff to pay filing fees or submit a corrected prisoner authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Antonio Molina Perez, a detained plaintiff representing himself and seeking to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

What happened

In Perez v. Deprospo, Antonio Molina Perez, who is detained at Orange County Jail and is representing himself, asked to proceed without paying the filing fees upfront. He submitted the required application and authorization, but the authorization did not specifically allow the court to collect the $350 filing fee from his prison account.

The court ordered Perez, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a completed prisoner authorization labeled with the case number. The $402 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee; people approved to proceed without prepaying fees do not owe the administrative fee, but the $350 filing fee is collected from a prison account in installments.

If Perez complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he does not, the action will be dismissed. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying appeal fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. Deprospo · No. 1:22-cv-02866
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 12, 2022

Background

Antonio Molina Perez, who is detained at Orange County Jail, brought this action without a lawyer against William L. Deprospo and other defendants. To start a civil action, a prisoner must either pay $402 in fees or request permission to proceed without prepaying them by submitting an application and a prisoner authorization.

The $402 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. If the court grants permission to proceed without prepaying fees, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee through installments deducted from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization must permit those deductions and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

Court’s action

Perez submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The court found that the authorization did not specifically state that the court could collect the $350 filing fee from Perez’s prison account.

The court ordered Perez, within 30 days of April 12, 2022, either to pay the full $402 or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. If he submits the authorization, it must be labeled with docket number 22-CV-2866 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. If Perez complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute, but it did not make such a dismissal in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.