Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 15, 2022

Green v. NBC Universal Media LLC

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-00239
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Green v. NBC Universal Media LLC, Judge Swain denied Green’s extension request because her appeal was timely and the motion appeared filed in the wrong case.

Who this affects

Courtney Green, who sought additional time to file a notice of appeal; NBC Universal Media LLC was the defendant in the underlying action.

What happened

In Green v. NBC Universal Media LLC, Courtney Green, representing herself, sued NBC Universal Media LLC, alleging that television shows surveilled and harassed her at home and collected her personal information. The court had dismissed the action as frivolous, and Green had already filed a notice of appeal from that dismissal.

Green later asked for more time to appeal an order she identified as entered on March 14, 2022. The court said the motion appeared to belong to a different case because it named Fox Corporation and no order or judgment had been entered in this case on that date. The court also said an extension was unnecessary because Green had timely appealed the April 4, 2022, dismissal.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied the motion for an extension of time to appeal. She also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Green permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Green v. NBC Universal Media LLC · No. 1:22-cv-00239
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 15, 2022

Background

Courtney Green, who was representing herself, sued NBC Universal Media LLC based on allegations that multiple television shows surveilled and harassed her in her home and collected her personal information. Green invoked the court’s diversity jurisdiction. On April 4, 2022, the court dismissed the action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The court denied Green’s motion for reconsideration the next day. Green also filed a notice of appeal from the April 4 dismissal, and the court transmitted that notice to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Motion for More Time to Appeal

On April 12, 2022, Green filed a motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) seeking more time to file a notice of appeal. She stated that she wanted to appeal an order or judgment entered on March 14, 2022. Although the motion listed this case’s number, its caption named Fox Corporation as the defendant. The court noted that Green had a separate case against Fox Corporation, but no order or judgment had been entered in this case on March 14, 2022.

The court therefore concluded that the motion appeared to have been filed in the wrong case and denied it without prejudice. The court separately explained that, even if Green intended to file the motion in this case, it was unnecessary. A party generally has 30 days after entry of the order or judgment being challenged to file a notice of appeal. Green had already filed her notice of appeal within 30 days after the April 4 dismissal.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Green’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The order’s conclusion states that the motion was denied. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Green permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.